The Best of Bookers - Shortlist Announced
This year is the 40th anniversary of the Booker Prize, and as I noted some time ago in a post that I not can't find, three judges have put together a shortlist of what they consider to be the six best Booker winners since the prize's inception. Said shortlist was annuonced this week. The lucky nominees are:
- The Ghost Road Pat Barker (1995)
- Midnight's Children Salman Rushdie (1981)
- Oscar and Lucinda Peter Carey (1988)
- Disgrace JM Coetzee (1999)
- The Conservationist Nadime Gordimer (1974)
- The Siege of Krishnapur JG Farrell (1973)
Now, here's the kicker. I haven't read any of them. In fact, I only own one of them (Oscar and Lucinda). Therefore, the chances of me making giving an informed opinion on any of the above are, frankly, slim to none. I can, though, give my opinion on books that aren't on the list. Pointless? Possibly. Possibly not.
Firstly, I would like to express my relief and profound thanks to the judges for not selecting Life of Pi. Rarely has a fiction book made me actually angry, but this one did. I was also angry at the judges who chose it that year over Sarah Waters's Fingersmith. Now, I am not a person particularly confident in my writing abilities; as much as I harbour the novel-writing dream (along with God knows how many other readers), I do not think my writing is yet good enough to start showing to anyone other than my boyfriend and my cats. I am not that arrogant. However, reading Life of Pi, I found myself thinking "I could do better than this. I could definitely do better than this" all the way through. And don't get me started on the ending, OK? Just. Don't.
However, I am sad not to see AS Byatt's bloody fantastic Possession on the list, which remains pretty much my favourite Booker winner, like, ever.* In fact, I must reread it soon, when I have got over the reading block. Speaking of the reading block, I have taken all the novels away from the bedside table and have stacked them in a neat pile in the corner. In their stead lies a small pile of short story and poetry collections, thus: The Book of Other People, edited by Zadie Smith, The Collected Stories of Grace Paley, The Collected Stories of Lorrie Moore, The Collected Novels and Stories of Kate Chopin, and The New Oxford Book of Victorian Verse. I must say that so far the plan is working rather well. Last night I managed to read one story from the Grace Paley, one by Lorrie Moore, and one by Kate Chopin, while this morning before I got up I read one from the Zadie Smith volume, and a few Edward Lear poems. I think I might have cracked it.
*The "like" is ironic. I promise.



Now, I admit that I am at a disadvantage when talking about this list because I haven't read any of them, and know absolutely nothing about six of them, but it seems to me that if we were voting for "books to talk about", then Boy A is almost unrivalled in its controversial subject matter. It is the story of a 24 year old man, who has just been released from a young offenders' institution, after spending nearly all of his childhood inside for a crime he committed while a youngster. Cue obvious comparisons to the James Bulger murder, the perpertrators of which were infamously released into the community once they were in their twenties, with new identities and lifelong anonymity. If a book is going to polarise opinion as to its taste and decency then I'd put my money on this one. Can you empathise with someone who has committed a horrific crime, no matter how young they were when they did it? Does it mean they were "born evil"? There must be few novels more controversial than this (though I grant you that Death of a Murderer has Myra Hindley on the front cover, so chances are it might be giving Boy A a run for its money). Perhaps this new focus on the novel will give me a nudge to finally get around to reading it (though as those of you who read yesterday's post will know, the last thing I need right now is to make a start on another book).
Congratulations to Glasgow writer (and stand up comedienne) AL Kennedy for scooping the Costa Prize last night, for her novel Day.
What Was Lost is a story based around the fictional Green Oaks Shopping Centre, somewhere near Birmingham (at least, I assume it's fictional, I'm sure someone will correct me if it's not). It opens in 1984 with Kate Meaney, a child who wants to be a private detective with her toy monkey Mickey as her sidekick. She stakes out Green Oaks, making copious notes on her observations and following suspicious looking characters.
I'm so disappointed that I felt the need to abandon The Gathering. I thought, as regular readers will know, that this would be right up my particular literary street. Bleakness. Family strife. Normally, I love it. Not this time, however.
Recent Comments